Archive for stock market
Buffett talks fear, finances, and forging ahead
Posted by: | CommentsAre you scared to make a financial move right now? Are you getting seasick watching the market move? What’s The Oracle of Omaha investing in now?
Words From Warren…
Posted by: | CommentsTo the Shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway Inc.:
Our gain in net worth during 2009 was $21.8 billion, which increased the per-share book value of both our Class A and Class B stock by 19.8%. Over the last 45 years (that is, since present management took over)book value has grown from $19 to $84,487, a rate of 20.3% compounded annually.*
Berkshire’s recent acquisition of Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) has added at least 65,000shareholders to the 500,000 or so already on our books. It’s important to Charlie Munger, my long-time partner,and me that all of our owners understand Berkshire’s operations, goals, limitations and culture. In each annual report, consequently, we restate the economic principles that guide us. This year these principles appear on pages89-94 and I urge all of you – but particularly our new shareholders – to read them. Berkshire has adhered to these principles for decades and will continue to do so long after I’m gone.In this letter we will also review some of the basics of our business, hoping to provide both a freshman orientation session for our BNSF newcomers and a refresher course for Berkshire veterans.
To download and read the entire annual report please click the link below:
Verizon Communication (VZ)
Posted by: | CommentsVerizon Communications
A friend of mine asked me if investing in Verizon communications (VZ) would be a prudent move. Instead of answering him directly I told him I would get back with him. I am going to tell him to check out this post. I am going to attempt to teach my friend how to fish instead of just giving him one. We are going to look at Verizon Communications (VZ) through the lens of the CAN SLIM investment strategy created by one of my favorites William O’Neal.
CAN SLIM is an acronym for C= current earnings, A=annual earnings, N=new product/service or new management, S= Supply and Demand refers to trading volume,L= Leaders or Laggard, I= Institutional ownership (mutual fund, hedge fund or pension fund ownership) and the vitally important M= market direction. As of the writing of this the price of
Verizon Communications (VZ) is $28.93 their 52 week is range is $26.10-$34.13. Their current earnings per share last quarter were in line with consensus view of $.54 a share. Their annual earnings for 2009 $2.40 per share, which also met analyst consensus. There are currently no new products/services, no new management changes or new price changes.
Verizon’s daily average volume is 19,239,400 their volume is was 14,221,400 on Friday February 12th. Not a good sign. The top 5 companies in the telecom industry are cnsl, idtc, idt, ctl, and eght. None of these companies are setting the world on fire they are all laggards and not showing real strength. There are 5,622 large block institutional owners including State Street, Vanguard, Fidelty, Black Rock ,TIIA-CREF among others. Their turnover for the stock is low to moderate. The market is in a correction and has been for several weeks. At this time there is no catalyst to propel Verizon Communications (VZ) higher. According to the CAN SLIM investment strategy this stock would not be a buy. They do have a dividend of 6.6% but that is not a good enough reason to own the stock. If you own the stock I would buy puts to protect myself from falling prices or raise cash. If you must own telecom I would ask myself why and rule against it because the industry rank is currently 156. According to Investor’s Business Daily Verizon is 25th out of 38 stocks not a stock that would motivate me to buy. If you absolutely must own telecom buy one of the top 5 companies cnsl, idtc, idt, ctl, and eght. Otherwise I would find a better company in a more promising industry. At this time Verizon is not a buy.
Keathel H. Haynes III, Chief Investment Officer
http://www.blackswanmanagementllc.com/
We are businessmen who use technology as a tool. Let us create your website and develop it into a cash portal or update an existing website for your business to get more customers and make more money. Go to our site right now to learn how to use the web to get more customers.
Should You Invest in Warren Buffett?
Posted by: | CommentsThis article was originally published on the CBS Money Watch site and was written by Conrad de Aenlle.

Warren Buffett
Wouldn’t you be thrilled if your portfolio achieved the same returns as Warren Buffett’s? It may seem impossible, but it’s really a snap: Just own shares in his corporate alter ego, Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B).
- The price of entry for investors is coming down: On Wednesday, shareholders are expected to approve a 50-1 split of the company’s B-shares, which will take the share price down from around $3,260 to $65.
If history is an accurate guide — and there’s no guarantee it is — it’s a smart way to invest. A $1,000 stake in Berkshire at the start of 1990 would have grown to roughly $12,000 by the end of last year, crushing the broader market. Had you invested the same amount in Vanguard’s Standard & Poor’s 500 index fund(VFINX) and reinvested dividends, your stake would be worth about $4,750.
A handful of hedge fund geniuses may have produced results similar to Berkshire’s while operating from mountain aeries and using complex, opaque investment strategies. Buffett did it primarily by holding blue-chip American stocks in a publicly listed company. It doesn’t work flawlessly; Berkshire has lagged the market over the past year, returning less than 10 percent while the S&P is up more than 30 percent. But if you’re worried about such short-term horizons, don’t invest with Warren Buffett.
Buy Shares … in Moderation
Fund managers and financial advisers say you could do a lot worse than to own Berkshire. They suggest doing it in moderation, though, because as time goes on, Berkshire’s returns are likely to, well, moderate.
“If you listen to Buffett himself, he’s pretty confident in the long-term future of the company, but he has told people not to expect returns to be as good as in the past,” said Richard Graziadei, lead equity manager for TIAA-CREF Trust Co. “No one should go in thinking it’s going to replicate its past record.”
That record has been accomplished through Buffett’s display of many traits widely recognized as the right stuff of investing. He buys into established businesses with consistent earnings, not fledgling enterprises, and he insists on paying what he deems a bargain price. That often means going against conventional thinking and buying companies relegated to Wall Street’s doghouse. After he has made a purchase — this is another sign that he is uninterested in public opinion — he has the patience to wait until it pays off or until he determines that it probably never will.
It sounds simple enough. What sets Buffett apart from his peers is not his investment strategy, his admirers say, but his ability to implement it.
“You don’t have to have the I.Q. of an M.I.T. Ph.D. in math, but you do have to have common sense” to invest wisely, said George Schwartz, chief investment officer of the Ave Maria Mutual Funds. “The problem is a lot of people don’t apply common sense, they don’t look at investment opportunities with the cold logic that he does.”
Berkshire’s chief executive “is a master of contrarian thinking,” said Schwartz, who has kept a portion of his personal money in Berkshire since 1981. “That’s how to make money. You’ve got to buy when no one else is buying. He practices that.”
In Buffett’s Portfolio
He practices another key element of solid portfolio construction: diversification. The list of Berkshire Hathaway’s holdings reads like a What’s What of corporate America, including American Express (AXP), Coca-Cola (KO), Procter & Gamble (PG), Kraft (KFT), Wells Fargo (WFC), General Electric (GE), Goldman Sachs (GS), Dow Chemical (DOW), and Conoco Phillips (COP).
Berkshire reported $57.4 billion of stock investments and $37.4 billion in government and corporate bonds at the end of September. The remaining $36 billion or so of the company’s worth was accounted for by entities in which it holds more than a 20 percent stake, making them more like operating divisions. These include Geico and other insurance subsidiaries and Burlington Northern Santa Fe, the railroad that Berkshire took complete ownership of in November.
Buffett has always held a potent mix of businesses. Anyone who made a modest outlay, say $10,000, to buy Berkshire in the early 1980s, when Schwartz did, would be a millionaire now, barely a quarter-century later. There’s your retirement all squared away.
But as it says in the fine print of any investment, past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investment advisers caution that Berkshire’s returns are likely to dissipate, mainly because the company and Buffett have become victims of their own success. Berkshire’s market value of more than $150 billion and annual sales exceeding $100 billion suggest that it has run afoul of the law of large numbers. At that size, it takes ever bigger acquisitions to have a significant impact on earnings, so earnings growth is bound to slow.
“It’s not as easy for them to move the needle as when [Berkshire Hathaway] was a $15 billion or $20 billion company,” said Brian Washkowiak, director of research for Talon Asset Management, a Chicago financial planning firm. “We consider ourselves Warren Buffett disciples,” he added, “but I would advise against putting all your eggs into Berkshire Hathaway.”
Tom Forester, manager of the Forester Value Fund, noted that Buffett’s following with the public has sent Berkshire’s stock to a sizeable valuation premium over the broad market. It traded recently at 31 times its profits for the latest four quarters, compared with just over 20 for the S&P 500.
“I’m more a fan of [Buffett’s] investment acumen than I am of Berkshire,” Forester said. “I’m a value guy, too, so I don’t like paying premiums for things.” By other measures, however, Berkshire shares look cheaper: Barron’s estimates that shares are trading at 1.2 times book value.
The Age Factor
The other caveat issued to prospective Berkshire shareholders is actuarial, not financial. Buffett is 79, and his inevitable departure one day gives the laudatory remarks about him a more ominous ring. When Schwartz calls Berkshire “a unique company run by a unique individual,” it raises questions about how it will fare when someone who is not one of a kind takes over.
Whatever misgivings they may have about Berkshire, these investors consider it an excellent holding, as long as there are plenty of other assets to go with it. “What I would tell most clients is that they need other pieces of broad exposure,” Graziadei, of TIAA-CREF, advised. With Berkshire’s heavy concentration in large American companies, he would focus on complementary asset classes, such as bonds of different types; international stocks, including emerging markets for risk-tolerant investors; and possibly real estate. Washkowiak made similar suggestions, and he would also allocate capital to small and medium-sized companies.
When assessing Berkshire’s place in a portfolio and the right price to pay for the stock, investors would do well to give it the same scrutiny as Buffett does with his prospective investments, Graziadei said.
“You must be committed to truly understanding this company inside and out,” he said, “and developing the expertise to make a judgment call and buy when you think it’s undervalued.”
About the Author
Conrad de Aenlle has been an investment and personal finance writer for nearly 20 years, covering international markets, portfolio management, and financial planning, among other topics. His features and columns have appeared in newspapers and magazines worldwide, including The New York Times, International Herald Tribune, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Sunday Business, The Scotsman, Institutional Investor, Funds Europe, and International Fund Investment. After working in London and Paris for 14 years, de Aenlle is based in Long Beach, Calif.
5 Legendary Investors Whom You Are Sure to be Interested In
Posted by: | CommentsOriginally posted at the Investing School blog
We like to highlight the people that do exceptionally well in every industry. In sports, there are all-stars and in Hollywood, there are super stars. We follow these people and try to know everything about them because if we can’t be like them, we can at least know about them.
The investment industry is the same, where there are many people we termed Legendary Investors. Here are a few of them:
1. Warren Buffett

The Oracle of Omaha
Warren must be the most famous of them all because he is currently still running his own company and buying and selling investments. It also doesn’t hurt that he is the world’s richest man!
Recommended Books About Warren Buffett: The Snowball: Warren Buffett and the Business of Life.
2. Jim Rogers

Jim Rogers--The Legend
Jim Rogers is a hedge fund manager who co-founded The Quantum Fund in the 1970s and subsequently made 42 times the investment in the next decade. His fame however didn’t rise until after he retired in 1980 as he made bold calls such as predicting China’s huge growth, the rise in commodity price as well as the credit crisis months before the gigantic collapse of the market in October of 2008.
Recommended Books By Jim Rogers: A Gift to My Children: A Father’s Lessons for Life and Investing, Investment Biker: Around the World with Jim Rogers
, and Adventure Capitalist: The Ultimate Road Trip
.
3. Peter Lynch

Beat the street by investing in what you know
Hired initially as an intern at Fidelity Investments, Peter Lynch eventually turned the Magellan Fund from $18 million under management to more than $14 billion. His most famous investment philosophy is “Invest in what you know” which is very easy to understand for the retail investor.
Recommended Books by Peter Lynch: One Up On Wall Street : How To Use What You Already Know To Make Money In The Market and Beating the Street
.
4. Bill Miller

The jury's still out on Bill Miller's 'legend' status
Before 2007, Bill Miller was undoubtedly regarded as an legendary investor with his Legg Mason Value Trust outperforming the S&P 500 every year from 1991 to 2005. However, his many bad bets on the financial industries in 2008 has trashed his reputation as well as all the value he’s ever created for the fund’s shareholders through the years. While he is still managing the Legg Mason Value Trust Fund, many are asking for his resignation.
Books About Bill Miller: The Man Who Beats the S&P: Investing with Bill Miller (Author’s Note: buy this if you still dare)
5. Benjamin Graham

If Warren Buffett was Luke Skywalker, Graham would be Yoda!
Perhaps more an educator than an investor, Benjamin Graham is considered one of the first to teach about value investing. His students included the likes of Warren Buffett and was very influential in providing his students with a sound investment framework. In fact, Warren Buffett described Graham as the second most influential person after Buffett’s own father.
Recommended Books by Benjamin Graham: Security Analysis: Sixth Edition, Foreword by Warren Buffett (Security Analysis Prior Editions) and The Intelligent Investor: The Classic Text on Value Investing
.
Whether you agree with their investment philosophy or not, you can’t deny the success (through skill or luck) they’ve had in the past. However, as Bill Miller’s case pointed out, if it’s hard enough to pick consistent winning investments, it might be harder to pick a fund manager who will consistently out perform the board market!
The Art of Not Losing Money
Posted by: | CommentsRule No.1: Never lose money. Rule No.2: Never forget rule No.1
Warren Buffett

Follow these directions on your road to safety
Let’s take a moment and step away from technical analysis, stock tips, and high finance. Let’s talk about something that’s not quite as ‘sexy’ but is infinitely more important in your day-to-day dealings as an investor. Cash management and safety.
According to full-time trader and author Karl Denninger, “Return of capital is more important than return on capital. Put another way, the first rule of investing is “don’t lose money!” Everyone wants to chase a winner; this, unfortunately, is why most investors lose compared to the markets over time.”
The first thing an investor must master is The Art of Not Losing Money.
Most investors only focus on the possible gains to be made. Learning not to lose money sounds boring and we all want to make the big bucks when investing, but the fundamental skill that you must have as an investor is the ability to protect your capital and the patience to wait for the right opportunity in which to invest that capital. Any full-time trader (or professional gambler for that matter) will tell you that it’s fine to have the know-how, but if you don’t have a bankroll—you’re out of the game!
Most investment books and magazines will have plenty of articles about investment strategies, investment gurus, and investment advice. Few will tell you the naked truth—without something to invest, you will never be able to take advantage of the opportunities that come your way.
Karl Denninger feels that it’s “… fine to speculate with money you can afford to lose, but your core capital should never be exposed to a market that is trading on bubble economics unless you’re close to the door and can leave fast – and for most investors that’s not possible with their “long-term” funds. The key to long-term outperformance (the real goal in any such portfolio) is to STAY OUT during times like this, and take advantage of long-term (and deferred) tax advantages during periods when the markets are trading on fundamental value.”
Think about this for a minute: If you lose 50% in the market, you need to get a gain of 100% just to get back to even. How often will the market go up 100%? It will likely take many years. But, if you lose 20% in the market, it only takes a 25% gain to get back to even. 20% is still a lot, but a 25% rebound in the market is certainly a reasonable expectation and can be achieved in one year’s time.

Managing your cash really boils down to discipline. Just remember that as an investor, your bankroll is your lifeblood. Without it you can’t invest – it doesn’t get any simpler than that. Despite this simple truth, many people don’t see mastering The Art of Not Losing Money as a skill of the same importance as being able to calculate ROI or analyze emerging markets. All the investment strategies and hot tips in the world don’t mean anything, though, if you don’t have money to invest.
About the Author
Anthony Sills, M.B.A. formerly traded FOREX from the Atlanta Financial Center and has worked for stock advisory services, brokerages, Fortune 100 companies, and national banks. Mr. Sills is currently a licensed loan officer and freelance writer. You can reach him at anthony@professionalpenwriters.com.
What’s It Take to Find a Well-Managed Bank?
Posted by: | CommentsBy The Motley Fool’s Toby Shute
January 11, 2010
Because leverage of 20:1 magnifies the effects of managerial strengths and weaknesses, we have no interest in purchasing shares of a poorly-managed bank at a “cheap” price. Instead, our only interest is in buying into well-managed banks at fair prices. — Warren Buffett, 1990 Chairman’s Letter to Shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-A) (NYSE: BRK-B)

“It’s far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price.”
While I don’t spend a lot of time looking at bank stocks, every once in a while I run a screen to try and find a well-managed bank selling at a fair price.
Last year, on the premise that banking is a commodity business in which the low-cost provider has a competitive advantage, I searched for banks that sported both lower borrowing costs and higher net interest margins than Buffett favorite Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC). That led me to a few interesting names, including Westamerica Bancorp (Nasdaq: WABC) and SVB Financial Group.
Today I’ve done something different, taking the above quote a bit more literally.
As a proxy for management quality, I’ve decided to screen for both a solid average return on assets (1.25% or better) and respectable growth in tangible book value (at least 8% compounded) over the past seven years. To try and weed out reckless lenders, I’ve limited my search to banks whose nonperforming loans represent fewer than 5% of total loans. As for a fair price, I’m looking for banks trading at less than twice tangible book value.
How many U.S. bank stocks do you suppose meet these basic criteria? 100? 50? Try 17. Here are the eight largest:
| Company | Market Capitalization | 10-Year Avg. Total Return Through 12/31/09 | Motley Fool CAPS Rating (out of 5) |
| Capital One | $19,090 million | 0.0% | * |
| International Bancshares(Nasdaq: IBOC) | $1,360 million | 9.5% | * |
| CVB Financial | $1,011 million | 8.5% | ** |
| PacWest Bancorp(Nasdaq: PACW) | $784 million | n/a | * |
| BancFirst Corporation | $562 million | 10.2% | * |
| Bank of the Ozarks(Nasdaq: OZRK) | $505 million | 21.3% | * |
| Nara Bancorp | $436 million | 18.8% | * |
| SY Bancorp | $297 million | 10.1% | * |
Total return data courtesy of Morningstar.
That CAPS star rating is out of a possible five, by the way. Clearly our community doesn’t think much of these stocks! But note the firms’ 10-year returns, which look quite good compared to a ghastly performance by the overall industry (or the broader stock market, for that matter). Surely at least one of these banks is going to continue delivering for shareholders, no?
A sad day for value hounds
At around 6.5 times pre-tax earnings and 10.7 times after-tax earnings, International Bancshares is arguably the cheapest of the lot. That’s fairly depressing, given that Buffett accumulated 10% of Wells Fargo in 1990, another period of serious disarray in the financial sector, at less than half this valuation. Fortunately, IBC has a guy in a bee costume on its website, which cheers me up somewhat.
As far as fundamentals go, IBC doesn’t particularly stand out from the group, aside from having the strongest Tier 1 capital ratio (17.2%). Interestingly, that didn’t stop the firm from participating in the Treasury’s TARP program. For political reasons, the country’s large banks really had no choice but to take the money (and are now racing to return it), but there were plenty of strong, smaller banks that were willing to take a pass on TARP and all its attending restrictions. IBC reported last quarter that its “strong earnings substantially neutralized the cost of the TARP funding,” but it seems that earning power was still diverted unnecessarily.
California beauty, only than skin deep?
Another TARP recipient, CVB Financial, impresses me with its $300,000 in revenue per employee. I love a company that can do more with less. This metric suggests a higher degree of automation than is employed at firms like PacWest and BancFirst.
CVB explicitly targets a return on assets of 1.35%, a return on equity of 20%, and earnings growth of 15% a year. These are admirable targets, but the company hasn’t seen results this strong since the 2004-2005 period of blissful banking.
My biggest issue with CVB, based in California’s Inland Empire, is the firm’s location, and consequent exposure to real estate loans in one of the bubbliest parts of the country. That consideration, combined with the fact that the bank put its name (Citizens Business Bank) on a local sports arena — a folksy, yet potent, contrarian signal ranking up there with magazine covers — is probably enough to keep me away.
A final Foolish thought
It’s possible that I’ve gone about this search all wrong. By favoring growth in book value during a period in which a lot of dumb lending occurred, I’m penalizing firms that had the good sense to sit this activity out. Good sense is tough to screen for. If you have thoughts on other ways to identify well-managed banks, I’d love to hear them.
© 1995-2008 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved.
This article was originally published on The Motley Fool’s website and you can read the original article by clicking here:
http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2010/01/11/whats-it-take-to-find-a-well-managed-bank.aspx
Investing in the Stock Market
Posted by: | CommentsForeword
Over the past few years the stock market has made substantial declines. Some short term investors have lost a good bit of money. Many new stock market investors look at this and become very skeptical about getting in now.
If you are considering investing in the stock market it is very important that you understand how the markets work. All of the financial and market data that the newcomer is bombarded with can leave them confused and overwhelmed.
The stock market is an everyday term used to describe a place where stock in companies is bought and sold. Companies issues stock to finance new equipment, buy other companies, expand their business, introduce new products and services, etc. The investors who buy this stock now own a share of the company. If the company does well the price of their stock increases. If the company does not do well the stock price decreases. If the price that you sell your stock for is more than you paid for it, you have made money.
When you buy stock in a company you share in the profits and losses of the company until you sell your stock or the company goes out of business. Studies have shown that long term stock ownership has been one of the best investment strategies for most people.
People buy stocks on a tip from a friend, a phone call from a broker, or a recommendation from a TV analyst. They buy during a strong market. When the market later begins to decline they panic and sell for a loss. This is the typical horror story we hear from people who have no investment strategy.
Before committing your hard earned money to the stock market it will behoove you to consider the risks and benefits of doing so. You must have an investment strategy. This strategy will define what and when to buy and when you will sell it.
History of the Stock Market
Over two hundred years ago private banks began to sell stock to raise money to expand. This was a new way to invest and a way for the rich to get richer. In 1792 twenty four large merchants agreed to form a market known as the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). They agreed to meet daily on Wall Street and buy and sell stocks.
By the mid-1800s the United States was experiencing rapid growth. Companies began to sell stock to raise money for the expansion necessary to meet the growing demand for their products and services. The people who bought this stock became part owners of the company and shared in the profits or loss of the company.
A new form of investing began to emerge when investors realized that they could sell their stock to others. This is where speculation began to influence an investor’s decision to buy or sell and led the way to large fluctuations in stock prices.
Originally investing in the stock market was confined to the very wealthy. Now stock ownership has found it’s way to all sectors of our society.
What is a Stock?
A stock certificate is a piece of paper declaring that you own a piece of the company. Companies sell stock to finance expansion, hire people, advertise, etc. In general, the sale of stock help companies grow. The people who buy the stock share in the profits or losses of the company.
Trading of stock is generally driven by short term speculation about the company operations, products, services, etc. It is this speculation that influences an investor’s decision to buy or sell and what prices are attractive.
The company raises money through the primary market. This is the Initial Public Offering (IPO). Thereafter the stock is traded in the secondary market (what we call the stock market) when individual investors or traders buy and sell the shares to each other. The company is not involved in any profit or loss from this secondary market.
Technology and the Internet have made the stock market available to the mainstream public. Computers have made investing in the stock market very easy. Market and company news is available almost anywhere in the world. The Internet has brought a vast new group of investors into the stock market and this group continues to grow each year.
Bull Market – Bear Market
Anyone who has been following the stock market or watching TV news is probably familiar with the terms Bull Market and Bear Market. What do they mean?
A bull market is defined by steadily rising prices. The economy is thriving and companies are generally making a profit. Most investors feel that this trend will continue for some time. By contrast a bear market is one where prices are dropping. The economy is probably in a decline and many companies are experiencing difficulties. Now the investors are pessimistic about the future profitability of the stock market. Since investors’ attitudes tend to drive their willingness to buy or sell these trends normally perpetuate themselves until significant outside events intervene to cause a reversal of opinion.
In a bull market the investor hopes to buy early and hold the stock until it has reached it’s high. Obviously predicting the low and high is impossible. Since most investors are “bullish” they make more money in the rising bull market. They are willing to invest more money as the stock is rising and realize more profit.
Investing in a bear market incurs the greatest possibility of losses because the trend in downward and there is no end in sight. An investment strategy in this case might be short selling. Short selling is selling a stock that you don’t own. You can make arrangements with your broker to do this. You will in effect be borrowing shares from your broker to sell in the hope of buying them back later when the price has dropped. You will profit from the difference in the two prices. Another strategy for a bear market would be buying defensive stocks. These are stocks like utility companies that are not affected by the market downturn or companies that sell their products during all economic conditions.
Brokers
Traditionally investors bought and sold stock through large brokerage houses. They made a phone call to their broker who relayed their order to the exchange floor. These brokers also offered their services as stock advisors to people who knew very little about the market. These people relied on their broker to guide them and paid a hefty price in commissions and fees as a result. The advent of the Internet has led to a new class of brokerage houses. These firms provide on-line accounts where you may log in and buy and sell stocks from anywhere you can get an Internet connection. They usually don’t offer any market advice and only provide order execution. The Internet investor can find some good deals as the members of this new breed of electronic brokerage houses compete for your business!
Blue Chip Stocks
Large well established firms who have demonstrated good profitability and growth, dividend payout, and quality products and services are called blue chip stocks. They are usually the leaders of their industry, have been around for a long time, and are considered to be among the safest investments. Blue chip stocks are included in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, an index composed of thirty companies who are leaders in their industry groups. They are very popular among individual and institutional investors. Blue chip stocks attract investors who are interested in consistent dividends and growth as well as stability. They are rarely subject to the price volatility of other stocks and their share prices will normally be higher than other categories of stock. The downside of blue chips is that due to their stability they won’t appreciate as rapidly as compared to smaller up-and-coming stocks.
Penny Stocks
Penny Stocks are very low priced stocks and are very risky. They are usually issued by companies without a long term record of stability or profitability.
The appeal of penny stock is their low price. Though the odds are against it, if the company can get into a growth trend the share price can jump very rapidly. They are usually favored by the speculative investor.
Income Stocks
Income Stocks are stock that normally pay higher than average dividends. They are well established companies like utilities or telephone companies. Income stocks are popular with the investor who wants to own the stock for a long time and collect the dividends and who is not so interested in a gain in share price.
Value Stocks
Sometimes a company’s earnings and growth potential indicate that it’s share price should be higher than it is currently trading at. These stock are said to be Value Stocks. For the most part, the market and investors have ignored them. The investor who buys a value stock hopes that the market will soon realize what a bargain it is and begin to buy. This would drive up the share price.
Defensive Stocks
Defensive Stocks are issued by companies in industries that have demonstrated good performance in bad markets. Food and utility companies are defensive stocks.
Market Timing
One of the most well known market quotes is: “Buy Low – Sell High”. To be consistently successful in the stock market one needs strategy, discipline, knowledge, and tools. We need to understand our strategy and stick with it. This will prevent us from being distracted by emotion, panic, or greed.
One of the most prominent investing strategies used by “investment pros” is Market Timing. This is the attempt to predict future prices from past market performance. Forecasting stock prices has been a problem for as long as people have been trading stocks. The time to buy or sell a stock is based on a number of economic indicators derived from company analysis, stock charts, and various complex mathematical and computer based algorithms.
One example of market timing signals are those available from http://www.stock4today.com.
Risks
There are numerous risks involved in investing in the stock market. Knowing that these risks exist should be one of the things an investor is constantly aware of. The money you invest in the stock market is not guaranteed. For instance, you might buy a stock expecting a certain dividend or rate of share price increase. If the company experiences financial problems it may not live up to your dividend or price growth expectations. If the company goes out of business you will probably lose everything you invested in it. Due to the uncertainty of the outcome, you bear a certain amount of risk when you purchase a stock.
Stocks differ in the amount of risks they present. For instance, Internet stocks have demonstrated themselves to be much more risky than utility stocks.
One risk is the stocks reaction to news items about the company. Depending on how the investors interpret the new item, they may be influenced to buy or sell the stock. If enough of these investors begin to buy or sell at the same time it will cause the price to rise or fall.
One effective strategy to cope with risk is diversification. This means spreading out your investments over several stocks in different market sectors. Remember the saying: “Don’t put all your eggs in the same basket”.
As investors we need to find our “Risk Tolerance”. Risk tolerance is our emotional and financial ability to ride out a decline in the market without panicking and selling at a loss. When we define that point we make sure not to extend our investments beyond it.
Benefits
The same forces that bring risk into investing in the stock market also make possible the large gains many investors enjoy. It’s true that the fluctuations in the market make for losses as well as gains but if you have a proven strategy and stick with it over the long term you will be a winner!
The Internet has make investing in the stock market a possibility for almost everybody. The wealth of online information, articles, and stock quotes gives the average person the same abilities that were once available to only stock brokers. No longer does the investor need to contact a broker for this information or to place orders to buy or sell. We now have almost instant access to our accounts and the ability to place on-line orders in seconds. This new freedom has ushered in new masses of hopeful investors. Still this in not a random process of buying and selling stock. We need a strategy for selecting a suitable stock as well as timing to buy and sell in order to make a profit.
Day Trading
Day Trading is the attempt to buy and sell stock over a very short period of time. The day trader hopes to cash in on the short term fluctuations in a stock’s price. It would not be unusual for the day trader to buy and sell the same stock in a matter of a few minutes or to buy and sell the same stock several times a day.
Day traders sit in front of computer monitors all day looking for short term movement in a stock. They then attempt to get in on the movement before it reverses. The real day trader does not hold a stock overnight due to the risk of some event or news item triggering the stock to reverse direction. It takes intense concentration to monitor the minute by minute movement of several stocks.
Day trading involves a great deal of risk because of the uncertainty of the market behavior over the short term. The slightest economic or political news can cause a stock to fluctuate wildly and result in unexpected losses.
There are a few people who make respectable gains day trading. The people who probably make the most are the self proclaimed “experts” who sell the books or operate the web sites that cater to the day trader. Because of the profits to be made from sales to people who want to get rich quick, they make it seem as attractive as possible. The truth is that in the long run more people lose than gain by day trading. This does not translate into a very good investment.
Author: Harry Hooper
Article Source: EzineArticles.com
Provided by: Smart cooker
Black Swan Management, LLC
WarrenBuffettPicks.com
WisestockInvestor.com